ICLR 2027 Submission #58205

FreeAttn: Unlocking Native E3M4 for Efficient and Accurate Attention

FreeAttn is a Dual-Free (zero-inner-loop-overhead) block-scaled attention framework on Blackwell Tensor Cores, beating SageAttention2++ in 8-bit speed and accuracy while extending to 8/4 and 4/4 NVFP4.

Free #1 · Representation
Idle Exponent → 4th Mantissa + Register F2FP

K = 32 UE8M0 scaling keeps 99.93% of energy in [0.25, 30.0], cutting MSE 3.82–4.62× vs. E4M3 at 1.000× QMMA.SF speed; 1-instruction F2FP packs online P in registers (+4.6%–17.4%).

Free #2 · Softmax Invariance
1-Pass Outlier & Row-Sum Cancellation

Smooth-K/V, Scale-QK, and Hadamard-QK cancel algebraically across online softmax with zero inner-loop MMAs in one GDDR7 pass (1,467–1,559 GB/s vs. 420–445 GB/s unfused).

720p Video · Wan2.1-14B
24.02 dB · 1.42× Gen
+2.74 dB & 69s faster than Sage2++ F16
32K GQA LLMs · Qwen3-8B / 32B
100% LB-v2 · 1.97× Attn
32/32 match; 2.4–4.3× lower KL vs. E4M3
4-Bit NVFP4 · Qwen3-8B (32K QA)
80–143× Lower KL vs. Sage3
Native GQA; zero EOS or ffff... collapse
01 · Video Diffusion

1. Multi-Step Video Generation (720p, 3D Orbit & VBench)

Matched initial noise and schedules on one RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell GPU (96 GB GDDR7); only self-attention is replaced.

1.1 Split-Screen Comparison (Wan2.1-T2V-14B: 720p & 3D Camera Orbit)

Scene
Right Side
Left: BF16 Ref
Right: FreeAttn E3M4 (+Free)
1.69s / 5.06s (f27)

1.3 Bus-Front Crops & 4-Bit NVFP4 Recovery (Paper Fig. 1)

Paper Figure 1: Wan2.1-14B 720p Frame 27 comparison and 4-bit NVFP4 recovery
Figure 1 (Wan2.1-14B, 720p×81f, Frame 27): 8/8 E3M4 (+Free, 24.02 dB) preserves the two-window bus front (vs. 4 windows in Sage2++, rotated bus in Sage3); bottom row shows lossy 4/4 NVFP4 recovery from 12.56 → 18.42 / 17.69 dB (1.55× Gen). [Zoom]
02 · Autoregressive Language Models

2. Language Models Across 8-Bit, 8/4 & 4-Bit NVFP4

Evaluated on GQA LLMs (Qwen3-8B / 32B, S ≤ 32K), where official SageAttention3 fails natively on GQA and collapses after 4× KV replication.

2.1 Low-Precision Spectrum (Qwen3-8B / 32B, 32K LongBench-v2 & KV)

Official Sage3 GQA Crash (H_q=32, H_kv=8): RuntimeError: The size of tensor a (32) must match the size of tensor b (8) at non-singleton dimension 1
Precision Tier & Method GQA 8B KL ↓ 8B / 32B Agree ↑ 8B Attn KV (8B KL) Behavior
PyTorch SDPA BF16 (Ref) Yes 0.00000 100% / 100% 1.00× 16b (0.0000) Reference
FreeAttn 8/8 E3M4 (+Free) Yes 0.00325 100% / 100% 1.99× 8.25b (0.0087) 32/32 exact
FreeAttn 8/8 E4M3 (+Free) Yes 0.00794 87.5% / 93.8% 2.01× 8.25b (0.0313) 22.5K QA flip
SageAttention2++ (F16) Yes 0.00647 96.9% / 96.9% 1.76× 16b BF16 only 22.5K QA flip
FreeAttn 8/4 E3M4 (+Free+Paid) Yes 0.02026 90.6% / 96.9% 1.91× 6.25b (0.0556) Lossy; clean
FreeAttn 4/4 NVFP4 (+Free+Paid) Yes 0.02802 81.2% / 87.5% 1.94× 4.25b (0.2372) 69.5% 5-task; clean
SageAttention3 4/4 NVFP4* No 1.86–2.90† Fails / No GQA — — EOS & ffff...
32-item LongBench-v2 (S ≤ 32K) prefill means; KV = effective bits/elem (incl. K = 32 UE8M0) and 8-item 32K decode KL; 5-task = ARC-C, HellaSwag, MMLU, PIQA, WinoGrande (70.0% BF16). *†With 4× KV replication on 22.5K–31.9K QA, Sage3 KL is 1.86–2.90 vs. 0.0203–0.0234 for FreeAttn NVFP4 (80–143× worse).

2.2 Verbatim Outputs Across Precision Tiers (Qwen3-8B, Greedy)

Task
View
03 · Dual-Free Attention Framework

3. Dual-Free Framework: Beyond ISA Probes & SageAttention2++

3.1 Dual-Free Co-Design vs. Static E3M4 ISA Probes

Positioning vs. Prior FP8 PTQ & Public ISA Probes.
Approach Scaling & Online P Outlier / Bias Control Streaming Attention Result
Per-Tensor FP8 PTQ (Kuzmin'22; Shen'24) Global / channel scale; no online P Static range calibration Spikes clip E3M4 → favors E4M3
Public E3M4 ISA Probe (blackwell-isa'26) Static QMMA.SF; no packed F2FP None (static GEMM probe) No attention kernel (Raw E3M4: 16.80 dB)
FreeAttn Dual-Free (Ours) K=32 UE8M0 + 1-inst register F2FP 1-pass Smooth-K/V + Scale/Had-QK 3.82–4.62× lower MSE; 24.02 dB; 32/32 LB-v2

3.2 Why Faster & More Accurate Than SageAttention2++

Paper Figure 5: Mechanism ablations
Figure 5 (Mechanism Ablations): (a, b) Free #1 E3M4 vs. E4M3 MSE under K = 32 scaling; (c, d) register F2FP (+4.6%–17.4%) and Free #2 1-pass GDDR7 fusion; (e, f) stepwise Free/Paid gains (4/8 = 8b QK⊤ / 4b PV). [Zoom]
04 · Quantitative Benchmarks

4. Quantitative Benchmarks

Single NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell GPU (96 GB GDDR7); complete-call timings include fresh-input preparation and post-processing.

Table 1 · Arithmetic Formats and Architectural Support (Paper Table 1).
Implementation QK⊤ PV Head Dimensions & Attention Types
PyTorch SDPA / cuDNN BF16 BF16 D ∈ {64, 128, 256}, MHA & GQA
FlashAttention-4 BF16 BF16 D ∈ {64, 128}, MHA & GQA
SageAttention2 / 2++ (F16 or F32 Acc) INT8 FP8 E4M3 D ∈ {64, 128}, MHA & GQA (no D = 256)
SageAttention3 (Official Blackwell FP4) NVFP4 NVFP4 D = 128 only, MHA only (no GQA, no D ∈ {64, 256})
FreeAttn (Ours, Hardware QMMA.SF) FP8 E3M4 / E4M3 or NVFP4 FP8 E3M4 / E4M3 or NVFP4 D ∈ {64, 128, 256}, Native MHA & GQA
Paper Figure 4: Operator kernel and complete-call latency
Figure 4 (Operator Latency): Solid = kernel; framed = complete call. 8/8 E3M4 (+Free) matches E4M3 (1.000×) at 1.56–1.94× over Torch (1.05–1.53× over Sage2++; up to 3.4× on GQA / D ∈ {64, 256}). [Zoom]
Paper Figure 6: End-to-end fidelity and speedup across 7 models
Figure 6 (Seven-Model Summary): 32K KL on four GQA LLMs, multi-scene PSNR on Wan2.1-1.3B / 14B, and 720p single-step Rel-L2 on Wan2.1-14B / Wan2.2-5B vs. speedup. [Zoom]
Table 2 · Multi-Step Video Diffusion Quality & Latency (Wan2.1-1.3B & Wan2.1-14B).
Model / Suite Configuration 1-Step Rel-L2 ↓ PSNR (dB) ↑ SSIM ↑ LPIPS ↓ Attn (s) ↓ Full Gen (s) ↓
Wan2.1-1.3B (480p, 20-Step, 6-Scene) PyTorch SDPA BF16 0.00000 Ref 1.0000 0.0000 4.71 (1.00×) 19.47 (1.00×)
Wan2.1-1.3B (480p, 20-Step, 6-Scene) SageAttention2++ (FP16) 0.00593 23.37 0.8444 0.0877 2.79 (1.69×) 17.53 (1.11×)
Wan2.1-1.3B (480p, 20-Step, 6-Scene) SageAttention3 (NVFP4) 0.01704 13.71 0.4636 0.4627 2.79 (1.69×) 17.52 (1.11×)
Wan2.1-1.3B (480p, 20-Step, 6-Scene) FreeAttn 8/8 E4M3 (+Free) 0.00567 21.01 0.7747 0.1461 2.44 (1.93×) 17.18 (1.13×)
Wan2.1-1.3B (480p, 20-Step, 6-Scene) FreeAttn 8/8 E3M4 (+Free) 0.00536 23.85 0.8605 0.0821 2.46 (1.92×) 17.20 (1.13×)
Wan2.1-14B (720p×81f, 50-Step Turntable) PyTorch SDPA BF16 0.00000 Ref 1.0000 0.0000 12.77 (1.00×) 2235.7 (1.00×)
Wan2.1-14B (720p×81f, 50-Step Turntable) SageAttention2++ (FP16) 0.00572 21.28 0.9164 0.0775 6.96 (1.83×) 1638.6 (1.36×)
Wan2.1-14B (720p×81f, 50-Step Turntable) SageAttention3 (NVFP4) 0.00947 13.78 0.8295 0.2852 6.03 (2.12×) 1517.2 (1.47×)
Wan2.1-14B (720p×81f, 50-Step Turntable) FreeAttn 8/8 E4M3 (+Free) 0.00545 20.17 0.9103 0.0767 6.45 (1.98×) 1561.9 (1.43×)
Wan2.1-14B (720p×81f, 50-Step Turntable) FreeAttn 8/8 E3M4 (+Free) 0.00517 24.02 0.9435 0.0481 6.53 (1.96×) 1569.7 (1.42×)
Wan2.1-14B (720p×81f, 50-Step Turntable) FreeAttn 4/4 NVFP4 (+Free+Paid) 0.00572 — — — 5.81 (2.20×) —
Wan2.1-14B (720p×81f, 50-Step Turntable) FreeAttn 4/4 NVFP4 (+Smooth-QKV+Had) — 17.69 0.8822 0.1494 — 1439.7 (1.55×)
Wan2.1-14B (720p×81f, 50-Step Turntable) FreeAttn 4/4 NVFP4 (Raw) 0.01263 12.56 0.8069 0.3580 3.64 (3.50×) 1430.0 (1.56×)
Wan2.1-14B (480p, 20-Step, 4-Scene Mean) SageAttention2++ (FP16) 0.00643 22.02 0.8314 0.0961 11.60 (1.63×) 81.61 (1.09×)
Wan2.1-14B (480p, 20-Step, 4-Scene Mean) SageAttention3 (NVFP4) 0.01069 16.24 0.6501 0.2665 13.05 (1.45×) 83.07 (1.07×)
Wan2.1-14B (480p, 20-Step, 4-Scene Mean) FreeAttn 8/8 E4M3 (+Free) 0.00730 20.25 0.7888 0.1247 10.81 (1.75×) 80.89 (1.10×)
Wan2.1-14B (480p, 20-Step, 4-Scene Mean) FreeAttn 8/8 E3M4 (+Free) 0.00595 22.41 0.8501 0.0811 10.92 (1.74×) 80.99 (1.10×)
4-scene 50-step 720p Wan2.1-14B mean: 8/8 E3M4 (+Free) reaches 20.44 dB PSNR, 0.7939 SSIM (+0.0657 vs. E4M3), and 0.527× geometric-mean pixel MSE vs. matched 8/8 E4M3 (+Free).
Table 3 · 32K-Context GQA Language Prefill & LongBench-v2 (SageAttention3 unsupported natively on GQA).
Model & Suite Configuration Mean KL ↓ Agree ↑ Seq Match ↑ Attn (s) ↓ TTFT (s) ↓
Qwen3-8B · 32K Prefill (BF16: 0.889s / 2.583s) SageAttention2++ (FP16) 0.00179 99.02% — 0.512 (1.74×) 2.222 (1.16×)
Qwen3-8B · 32K Prefill FreeAttn 8/8 E4M3 (+Free) 0.00446 97.66% — 0.449 (1.98×) 2.181 (1.18×)
Qwen3-8B · 32K Prefill FreeAttn 8/8 E3M4 (+Free) 0.00187 98.63% — 0.451 (1.97×) 2.174 (1.19×)
Qwen3-32B · 32K Prefill (BF16: 3.141s / 10.073s) SageAttention2++ (FP16) 0.00152 98.05% — 1.774 (1.77×) 8.687 (1.16×)
Qwen3-32B · 32K Prefill FreeAttn 8/8 E4M3 (+Free) 0.00614 97.66% — 1.639 (1.92×) 8.520 (1.18×)
Qwen3-32B · 32K Prefill FreeAttn 8/8 E3M4 (+Free) 0.00144 98.24% — 1.659 (1.89×) 8.541 (1.18×)
Llama-3.1-8B · 32K Prefill (BF16: 0.792s / 2.470s) SageAttention2++ (FP16) 0.00137 98.97% — 0.456 (1.74×) 2.131 (1.16×)
Llama-3.1-8B · 32K Prefill FreeAttn 8/8 E4M3 (+Free) 0.00363 98.36% — 0.409 (1.94×) 2.081 (1.19×)
Llama-3.1-8B · 32K Prefill FreeAttn 8/8 E3M4 (+Free) 0.00146 98.92% — 0.414 (1.91×) 2.087 (1.18×)
Ministral-3-8B · 32K Prefill (BF16: 0.841s / 2.618s) SageAttention2++ (FP16) 0.00072 99.24% — 0.485 (1.73×) 2.260 (1.16×)
Ministral-3-8B · 32K Prefill FreeAttn 8/8 E4M3 (+Free) 0.00157 98.85% — 0.434 (1.94×) 2.200 (1.19×)
Ministral-3-8B · 32K Prefill FreeAttn 8/8 E3M4 (+Free) 0.00061 99.25% — 0.439 (1.92×) 2.210 (1.18×)
Qwen3-8B · LongBench-v2 (BF16: 0.488s / 1.70s) SageAttention2++ (FP16) 0.00647 96.9% 78.1% 0.278 (1.76×) 1.49 (1.13×)
Qwen3-8B · LongBench-v2 FreeAttn 8/8 E4M3 (+Free) 0.00794 87.5% 68.8% 0.242 (2.01×) 1.46 (1.16×)
Qwen3-8B · LongBench-v2 FreeAttn 8/8 E3M4 (+Free) 0.00325 100.0% (32/32) 93.8% 0.245 (1.99×) 1.46 (1.16×)
Qwen3-8B · LongBench-v2 FreeAttn 8/4 E3M4 (+Free+Paid) 0.02026 90.6% 78.1% 0.256 (1.91×) 1.46 (1.15×)
Qwen3-8B · LongBench-v2 FreeAttn 4/4 NVFP4 (+Free+Paid) 0.02802 81.2% 59.4% 0.252 (1.94×) 1.45 (1.16×)
Qwen3-32B · LongBench-v2 (BF16: 1.706s / 6.43s) SageAttention2++ (FP16) 0.00427 96.9% 75.0% 0.947 (1.80×) 5.68 (1.12×)
Qwen3-32B · LongBench-v2 FreeAttn 8/8 E4M3 (+Free) 0.00928 93.8% 75.0% 0.867 (1.97×) 5.59 (1.14×)
Qwen3-32B · LongBench-v2 FreeAttn 8/8 E3M4 (+Free) 0.00407 100.0% (32/32) 90.6% 0.876 (1.95×) 5.59 (1.14×)
Qwen3-32B · LongBench-v2 FreeAttn 8/4 E3M4 (+Free+Paid) 0.01730 96.9% 78.1% 0.908 (1.88×) 5.61 (1.14×)
Qwen3-32B · LongBench-v2 FreeAttn 4/4 NVFP4 (+Free+Paid) 0.02722 87.5% 81.2% 0.895 (1.91×) 5.56 (1.15×)
Agree = top-1 next-token match (32K Prefill) or 32-item answer match (LB-v2); Seq Match = 128-token greedy match. With +Paid, 8/8 E3M4 beats Sage2++ KL on all four 32K LLMs; on 5,120 5-task items (8B / 32B), E3M4 (+Free) scores 70.2% / 76.4% (BF16: 70.0% / 76.3%) and NVFP4 (+Free+Paid) retains 69.5% / 75.9%.
Table 4 · Complete-Call Latency (ms) & Rel-L2 vs. FP32 on Captured Layers (Paper Table 6).
Implementation (ms / Rel-L2) Qwen3-8B L21 Qwen3-32B L0 (32K) Wan1.3B L18 Wan14B L19 (720p)
PyTorch SDPA (BF16) 0.193 / 0.00172 47.75 / 0.00168 0.274 / 0.00168 328.72 / 0.00167
FlashAttention-4 (BF16) 0.234 / 0.00172 47.95 / 0.00168 0.296 / 0.00168 327.19 / 0.00211
SageAttention2++ (FP16) 0.190 / 0.03325 26.09 / 0.04127 0.217 / 0.00901 181.07 / 0.00974
FreeAttn 8/8 E3M4 (+Free) 0.124 / 0.02026 24.83 / 0.02283 0.163 / 0.00929 169.54 / 0.01085
FreeAttn 8/8 E3M4 (+Free+Paid) 0.156 / 0.01636 31.08 / 0.01614 0.214 / 0.00802 225.49 / 0.00971
SageAttention3 (4/4 NVFP4) 0.309* / 0.86897 — (No GQA) 0.319 / 0.06123 149.62 / 0.07232
FreeAttn 8/4 E3M4 (+Free) 0.108 / 0.08559 20.23 / 0.08186 0.139 / 0.02490 140.76 / 0.02749
FreeAttn 4/4 NVFP4 (+Free+Paid) 0.109 / 0.10536 20.92 / 0.09092 0.138 / 0.05477 144.98 / 0.06396
*With 4× KV replication on Qwen3-8B L21, Sage3 runs at 0.309 ms with 0.86897 Rel-L2 (8.2× higher than FreeAttn NVFP4 +Free+Paid; 42.9× higher than E3M4 +Free).